Iran / Military stance
Views Iran as a long-standing threat, saying it has been destabilizing for decades
Frames current actions as purely military, not political
Claims the U.S. has the capability to cripple Iran quickly (power grid, oil infrastructure like Kharg Island)
Signals operations are ongoing but nearing an end, saying the U.S. is not ready to leave yet but exit could come soon
Argues scrapping the Obama Iran deal prevented a nuclear war
Strait of Hormuz / Energy
Does not believe escorting ships is necessary in the Strait of Hormuz
Expects normal shipping to resume soon
Projects lower fuel prices once the conflict ends
Allies and global support
Strongly praises Middle East allies — Qatar, UAE, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain
Commends Israel’s strength and role in the conflict
Criticizes NATO, saying it should have been more involved
Expresses disappointment with UK PM Starmer, citing disagreements on immigration and energy policy
China relations
Plans to meet with Xi Jinping in ~5 weeks
Describes relationship with China as good and constructive
Intelligence / leadership
Welcomes resignation of National Counterterrorism Center director, criticizing prior assessment that Iran was not a threat
Bottom line
Hawkish on Iran, emphasizing military strength and imminent impact
Confident in a near-term resolution and normalization (shipping, energy)
Supportive of Middle East allies, critical of NATO and UK leadership
Maintains stable tone on China relations despite geopolitical tensions